How To Tell The Difference Between Passive and Active Antennas

Hell, I know I do. But here’s the deal: active antennas can really do a number on your system if you aren’t using them right. This article should get you up to speed on the active vs. passive debate.

First, two definitions:

Active antennas are any antennas with integrated signal amplifiers built right into the unit, like the AKG RA4000B-W.

Passive antennas are antennas that have no amplification stages, like the CP Beam.

An active antenna is a passive antenna that simply includes an onboard amplifier. There is no difference between the antenna element of an active or passive antenna of the same type; the only difference is whether an amplifier is included.

Active antennas can be used for both receiving and transmitting applications, but they are most often seen as receiving antennas. When used to receive signal, the integrated amp boosts the RF picked up by the antenna and allows much longer remote cable runs.

When used as a transmitting antenna, active antennas increase the RF power above and beyond whatever output power the transmitting device is using.***

The only practical reason to use an active antenna is to compensate for cable loss in receive applications. All RF signal loses strength (attenuates) as it passes through coaxial cable. The longer the cable run, the larger the loss. 100’ of RG8X will steal anywhere from -8 to -11 dB, depending on a few factors, like frequency. The amps on active antennas are designed to compensate for this loss by boosting the signal right behind the antenna before sending it down the line, so the gain at the receiver is closer to unity gain.

All too often, we’ll find a small theater or school or church system is using an active antenna at the side of a stage with a +12 dB amplifier on a 50’ or 25’ run. This gain is in addition to the + 6db of gain the paddle antenna itself imparts. With their transmitters at 30-50 mW, the front end of the wireless receiver gets overloaded and all hell breaks loose (except in a church, where hell is kept safely at bay).

We always encourage our customers to buy passive antennas, and then only add in-line amplifiers to make up for transmission line loss if they are doing very long cable runs of more than 100 feet.

With the introduction of low-cost RFoF technology, active antennas and in-line amplification are becoming increasingly obsolete. In the past, if an installed system required a cable run over 100’ there were only two options: use expensive plenum rated coax, or use some combination of active antennas/in-line amps and carefully manage the gain structure to avoid overload or coax line loss. With fiber optic transmission, signal can be sent miles with little to no loss at all.

***Use caution when deploying active antennas in transmit applications. In the VHF/UHF broadcast bands, most transmitters already operate at or near the maximum output power allowed by the FCC. Adding an amplification stage before the transmitting antenna risks exceeding those limits, so unlicensed UHF users should never include an active antenna in the signal chain of an IEM or intercom system. Plus, an active antenna’s amplifier would need to be bi-directional to function in a Tx setting. Not all of them use bidirectional amps.

Originally published by Alex Milne for RF Venue